Marten Scheffer (Amsterdam, Netherlands; 1958) earned a PhD in Ecology from the University of Utrecht in 1990. From 1985 to 1997, he held research posts at the Institute for Forestry and Landscape Planning, Wageningen (Netherlands) and the Institute for Inland Water Management and Waste Water Treatment. Currently, Scheffer is Professor of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management at Wageningen University, where he heads the department of the same name.
Founder-director of the Synergy Program for Analyzing Resilience and Critical Transitions (SparcS), he is also the driving force behind the more recent creation of two interdisciplinary research institutes: the Institute Para Limes at Nanyang Technological University (Singapore) and the South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Science (Uruguay).
In 2004, Scheffer received the Sustainability Science Award of the Ecological Society of America (where he has been an honorary member since 2011). He also holds the Spinoza Prize (2009) of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NOW in its Dutch initials). He is the recipient of an Advanced Grant from the European Research Council (ERC) to work on early warning signals for critical transitions, and of a prestigious Gravitation Grant from the Dutch Government for research into climate tipping points.
Scheffer serves on the science board of the Resilience Alliance, a group of ecologists, economists, and specialists in organizational dynamics, politics, and sociology aiming at developing an innovative research on resilient society-nature interactions. He is author of the books Ecology of Shallow Lakes (2004) and Critical Transitions in Nature and Society (2009), as well as devoting time to playing and composing music.
“Since the dawn of time, humanity has tried to understand the world through rituals and religion, but now we have something better: science.” These words by ecologist Marten Scheffer testify to the importance he places on knowledge, and indirectly add weight to his warning that “the decisions we take now will affect the lives of many generations to come.” Scheffer is no alarmist; he is simply expressing what he knows to be true. His research has revealed that human activity exposes ecosystems like the Amazon rainforest, the Arctic or, closer to home, the Doñana wetlands, to the risk of sudden collapse, with potentially irreversible consequences for the planet.
Another call to action for our collective future was the work of Gene E. Likens (Indiana, United States; 1935). In the 1960s, while studying supposedly unspoiled forest lakes in New Hampshire, Likens detected acidity levels in rainwater samples a hundred times greater than expected. “It was quite a shock. We didn’t know the causes of the problem, or how far it might extend,” he relates, “and it took us a long time to identify the causes.” His findings alerted the world to the seriousness of the acid rain problem, and hastened the adoption of measures to allay the threat.
The two ecologists share the Frontiers of Knowledge Award in Ecology and Conservation Biology for contributing decisively to what the jury describes as “one of the major challenges” in environmental conservation: to understand and anticipate ecosystem responses to human-induced alterations of the natural environment. Likens and Scheffer’s contributions now inform decision- making at every level, as well as finding practical application in ecosystem management and restoration.
Likens is the founding president of the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in New York. And the paper describing his results is considered one of the first scientific publications to usher in successful environmental legislation. When it appeared in Science in 1974, Likens wrote:“Only some of the ecological and economic effects of this widespread introduction of strong acids into natural systems are known at present, but clearly they must be considered in proposals for new energy sources and in the development of air quality emission standards.”
“Only some of the ecological and economic effects of this widespread introduction of strong acids into natural systems are known at present, but clearly they must be considered in proposals for new energy sources and in the development of air quality emission standards.”
Rain becomes acidic when the burning of fossil fuels produces sulfur and nitrogen oxides which atmospheric chemistry then transforms into acids. These compounds can travel thousands of kilometers from their place of origin, even affecting otherwise pristine regions. There is no doubting the severity of the problem. Acidity is not only lethal for many amphibians and fishes but also degrades soil quality, affects plant health and lowers crop yields.
The recommendations of Likens’ paper were taken on board in the U.S. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the main reason why the country’s rainfall is now 80 percent less acid than fifty years ago. Likens, though, is very far from crying victory: “Acid rain has been falling for many years, which has made the soil far more sensitive to other impacts.” And in other world regions, like the Indian sub-continent, the problem is getting worse.
Marten Scheffer, a professor at Wageningen University in the Netherlands, has also seen his work put to use in environmental management. It was he who showed that, as many had suspected, ecosystem change can reach a tipping point that propels the system to drastic and at times irreversible change. In our modern world, the trigger for such shifts is almost invariably human action.
The confirmation of these tipping points in ecosystem evolution came when the Dutch scientist was studying lakes that had turned turbid due to agricultural fertilizers. Scheffer was able to prove that even reducing the pollutant load failed to restore the lakes to their original state. Under the effect of the agrochemicals, the ecosystem had transitioned to a new equilibrium that resisted changing back again.
Scheffer believes, however, that the existence of tipping points can work in nature’s favor. “Once you understand how they work, you can harness them,” he explains, “to escape from an unwanted situation.” In the case of the lakes, for instance, the tipping point concept made it plain that only “shock therapy,” as Scheffer puts it, could get the waters clear again. And so it proved. The drastic, but effective measure they arrived at was none other than to empty the lake of all its fish, a solution still in use today.
Recently, Marten Scheffer has applied his model to the Doñana wetlands, Europe’s most important wintering site for waterbirds, hosting over half a million individuals. His conclusions provide a template to improve the system’s resilience to climate change. Among the greatest threats Doñana faces are the cyanobacteria toxins increasingly present due to both rising temperatures and higher concentrations of the fertilizers used on nearby strawberry crops. With the prospect of hotter weather ahead, the strategy should be reduce such nutrient inputs. And Scheffer is firm in his conviction that “local management has a vital role.”